Person #3: Your druid doth lose two points. Person #2: Nae! The source booke sayeth that requires some wolfsbane! Dr Gerard Cheshire claims the Voynich manuscript is written in the Proto-Romance language A university has distanced itself from an academic's claim to have deciphered a medieval manuscript. An illustration of two cells of a film strip. Person #1: Forsooth! I concoct an elixir of courage. It features drawings of unknown, exotic looking plants and many depictions of nude women. Man: Just imagine someone found a book from _our_ time, full of lists, illustrations, tables, and long, dry descriptions of nonexistent worlds written in an invented language. Escrito por Mila Yanovska In case anyone is unaware of the Voynich manuscript or its significance, it is a document that has been carbon-dated to the early 15th century which has long baffled scholars. Obvious? Linguists and cryptographers have been stumped for decades. Woman: It could be a hoax, a lost language, a cipher, an alien text, glossolatia - no one knows. It's some kind of visual encyclopedia of imaginary plants and undeciphered "recipes". The 240-page book was rediscovered by rare book dealer Wilfrid Voynich in 1912, although mentions of it date back to the 1600s. No modern hoax, this notoriously bizarre text has in fact passed through the hands of many over the years, including scientists, emperors, and collectors. Woman: This is the Voynich manuscript - a book, allegedly 500 years old, written in an unrecognized script. Having been carbon-dated to the 15th century, between 14, the Voynich Manuscript has been hotly debated by scholars, and has remained impervious to code-breakers for centuries. The Voynich manuscript is a real medieval book, and has been carbon-dated to the early 1400s. Rugg added that there are features that in the text that are inconsistent with most secret codes, such as the separation of words, which would in theory make it easier to crack.įollow Megan Gannon on Twitter and Google+. "I don't think there's much chance that the Voynich manuscript is simply an unidentified language, because there are too many features in its text that are very different from anything found in any real language." "It's been accepted for decades that the statistical properties of Voynichese are similar, but not identical, to those of real languages," Gordon Rugg, a researcher from Keele University, told the BBC. Some academics brushed off the findings, saying they're still convinced the manuscript is simply a hoax, not a lost language or an undecipherable code. References Goldstone, Lawrence and Nancy Goldstone. Kraus, who had purchased it from the estate of Ethel Voynich, Wilfrid Voynich’s widow. 24 The mystery of its meaning and origin has excited the popular imagination, provoking study and speculation. 23 The manuscript has never been demonstrably deciphered, and none of the proposed hypotheses have been independently verified. In 1969, the codex was given to the Beinecke Library by H. Codebreakers Prescott Currier, William Friedman, Elizebeth Friedman and John Tiltman were unsuccessful. "While the mystery of origins and meaning of the text still remain to be solved, the accumulated evidence about organization at different levels, limits severely the scope of the hoax hypothesis and suggests the presence of a genuine linguistic structure," Montemurro and Zanette concluded. Voynich purchased the manuscript from the Jesuit College at Frascati near Rome.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |